As we can see, Jung concluded wever

The self, also called self 'is the central regulator and unifying archetype of the psyche (conscious over the unconscious). "It is unknowable, a virtual center of mysterious constitution and which may require all: kinship with animals, gods, with crystals, stars, without that surprise us or cause disapproval. Also called 'the God in us' the beginnings of our whole psychic wever & ducre life seem to come inextricamente this point and the highest and ultimate goals seem to be directed at him. [1] The goal of the self is the psychological wholeness and completeness; has the character of a result, a hit only after great efforts purpose. It is the goal of life. It is not rational and definable. Self must be attached to it and it does not correspond to an opposition or even a submission. It is something transcendent and immutable that "can be justified psychologically, but not demonstrated in scientific mode" [2] "It is the wholeness that transcends consciousness." [3]
Intuitively humans were always aware of the 'self', the 'organizing center' of the psyche, "a kind of 'atomic nucleus' of our psychic system .... The Greeks called 'daimon', the inner man; Egypt was expressed in the concept of soul-Ba; and the Romans worshiped him as the 'genius'. In primitive societies imagined you as protective spirit. wever & ducre Can be defined as a factor of intimate orientation, different wever & ducre from the conscious personality. "[5]
As we can see, Jung concluded wever & ducre that the archetype of the divine image and self are indistinguishable. Just as the self is only the center of consciousness, the self expressed in his theory, all of the total personality (a unit of opposites of the psyche - the conscious and unconscious) [6], the central archetype of human wholeness, [7 ] comprising both conscious and unconscious. [8] Being the center of all this, is that it becomes wever & ducre a target. Proceeding from this, Jung also noted that the psychological experience of self and religious experience (numinous) are identical, it has the same basis: the unity and wholeness. "The whole is therefore empirically, one older and younger immeasurable dimension that consciousness enveloping her in time and space" [9]
The individuation is to Jung, "the achievement of all (that), a painful process of unification of opposites" [10] The conscious and unconscious conflict, fundamental psychic realities, this process produces wever & ducre development, individuation, a synthetic process integration of the self [11], the unconscious into consciousness. In this way, the individual performs its entirety, self-fulfilling, it becomes wever & ducre what it always was. [12] The experience of individuation, the becoming-self, is driven by the experience of "union of opposites", contrary to the true never separated in fact. [13] At the same time, this union is your motivation, your goal and essence. [14] "The individuation is an 'Mysterium conictionis' (mystery of unification), given that the self is perceived as the nuptial union of two antagonistic halves and represented as a composite whole" [15] is a process that conceives " a psychological wever & ducre 'individuum', ie, an indivisible unit, a whole "which comprises consciousness and also" the unpredictable field of unconscious events "[16]. This process of "unification of man" wever & ducre [17] of "becoming a single being" our own self [self], [18] reaching the 'individuality', our most intimate and incomparable uniqueness, "makes Multiple in One. But God is one, in which we match the imago Dei, the image of God. "[19] Therefore, such an event is" wever & ducre numinous character "[20].
Other authors who reflected on the sacred [21] also explore their perceptions through the union of ambiguities (besides sacred / profane, fearsome, dangerous / fascinating, as well as transgression / respect wever & ducre him reverence; impure / pure, interior / exterior; interdict / allowed; chaos / order, wever & ducre life / death, etc.). But as regards the sacred, believe the same way it is possible to combine these and all other polarities of opposites, wever & ducre "oppositorum coincidentia" because the sacred spiritual experience can be performed dynamically, as well as the experience of death and resurrection (which is the minimum of all the rituals structure according M. Bloch). This sacrificial notion is also in primitive and traditional rites, wever & ducre because the real or symbolic death consecrates the victim, distancing it from the profane world, everyday. (R. Girard).
When is the union of the individual with the shadow and the anima (or animus), ie, union with their opposites, Jung relates the experience of a constellation of compensating numinous experience archetypal contents. [22] In discussing the symbol as an integrative, unifying element of the conscious and the unconscious, wever & ducre place this "antithetical character" again as a numinous [23] character. These symbols 'unification' (union of OPOST